Your website has been hacked or defaced.

For a suitable information-only website, the temporary static version is designed to preserve the public page structure, content and URLs as closely as possible. We will explain any SEO risks we identify before recommending the recovery route.

If your website is suitable for Static Shield, we aim to keep its public content available while the compromised system is taken out of public reach. Websites with login, transactions, personalised content or other dynamic functions need to be assessed separately.

A backup taken after the compromise may restore the same weakness or unwanted code along with your content. For an eligible site, Static Shield creates a separate version of the public content without carrying over the original website application.

It is temporary by design. Static Shield controls the immediate website risk and gives you time to decide whether to clean and retain the existing system or invest in a rebuild.

Not through the compromised CMS. Changes to the temporary static version need to be handled and published separately until the chosen recovery route restores an appropriate content-editing process.

No. It is a target for an approved Static Shield on an eligible information-only website. Final timing depends on the complexity of the site and begins once scope, approval and required access are in place.

Yes. Our initial assessment can cover hacked websites across different platforms. Static Shield is platform-independent, but it is suitable only when every visitor receives the same public content. Red Airship will advise you during consultation.

Contact us. We will assess how the website works and advise on an appropriate containment or recovery route.

We review the evidence available, which may include website files, accounts, components and logs. Sometimes this reveals a likely entry point; where the evidence is incomplete, we will explain what we can and cannot confirm.

We tell you what the available evidence can and cannot confirm. If there is not enough information to rule out data access, we will explain the risk and recommend the appropriate next steps.

Our aim is to address more than the visible damage. We assess the available evidence, contain the immediate website risk and recommend a recovery route. The exact remediation scope is agreed after the assessment.

No. A private, headless CMS is one possible rebuild architecture. It applies only if a rebuild is selected and that approach is suitable for your organisation.

Pricing depends on what our discovery process finds. The initial recovery and Static Shield typically fall between S$2,500 and S$10,000, quoted as a fixed one-time fee. The full rebuild and ongoing protection are scoped separately once that step is completed.